- The White House is on the defensive and is attempting to have potentially compromising information redacted from the tens of thousands of secret military documents leaked Sunday by WikiLeaks. A lot of discussion on the leak from the Web:
- Richard Cohen of the Washington Post asks if the documents were leaking the obvious?
- New York Times op-ed contributor, Andrew Exum, says he has "seen nothing in the documents that has either surprised me or told me anything of significance."
- An editorial in the Washington Times suggests that these documents "produced no bombshell revelations."
- A Wall Street Journal review asks what else is there to learn from the leak other than that the U.S. classifies too many documents as secret?
- The leak, "is good for democracy and for our nation," writes Carol Rose in her Boston Globe blog.
- A new chief for BP - with a promise to fulfill all commitments to help in the Gulf. Robert Dudley, Jr. will take over in October and says, "taking over this role, I will not reduce my commitment in the region.”
- Looking ahead to the 2012 Republican presidential nomination race? Read about possible runs by Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty or perhaps by South Dakota Sen. John Thune.